Source: adapted from Muller, P.O. (1995) "Transportation and Urban Form: Stages
in the Spatial Evolution of the American Metropolis". In Hanson, S. (ed.) The
Geography of Urban Transportation, 2nd Edition, New York: Guilford, p. 29.
Evolution of Transportation and Urban Form in North America
and Europe
Both North American and European cities have been modified by similar technological
changes introduced since the industrial revolution. However, a different evolution
of urban form has occurred between European cities and their American counterparts,
especially from the second half of the 20th century. While European cities leaned
on public transit, North American cities relied more on the automobile. This evolution
had a direct impact on the urban form with four important periods in the evolution
of urban transportation can be identified:
- I - Walking-horsecar era (1800-1890). This era was characterized
by the absence of urban mass transportation mode. People had access to locations
that could be reached (walked) in less than 45 minutes (4 to 6 km). Urban densities
were very high as the available space was strongly constrained by accessibility.
All economic activities were concentrated in a central node along with residential
areas. Reduced mobility (pedestrian area) accounts for this concentration. The
horsecar made its debut in this period, which allowed the development of corridors
prevailed in the following period. From the 1850s, railways enabled radial development
adjacent to railway stations, especially in Europe and in older American cities
(e.g. New York).
- II - Streetcar era (1890-1920). The development of the first forms
of urban mass transportation lessened the accessibility constraint and enabled
cities to expand along main tramway (streetcar) lines, creating corridors. In
tripling the speed of urban transport, electric streetcars (public transit)
expanded the spatial structure of cities. This permitted the emergence of a
specialized downtown area with commercial and service activities. In Europe,
tramway lines tended to expand towards long established adjacent towns, which
were swallowed and integrated in the expanding city. This has allowed the development
of urban activities beyond city limits. The emergence of commercial development
centers along axes became apparent because more and more people, having access
to trolleys, decided to relocate outside the city limits. This reinforced social
stratification and favored the emergence of neighborhoods differentiated by
socioeconomic status. Less fortunate people, limited in their mobility, tended
to remain in central areas while the wealthier class relocated in the first
suburbs. The first suburban railroads entered in service and specialized industrial
districts started to take shape.
- III - Automobile era (1920-1945). Motorized transportation, mainly
buses and cars, radially expanded cities, once again lessening the accessibility
constraint. Never has a technical innovation had a greater impact on spatial
organization than the automobile. Initially, only wealthy classes could afford
their own automobiles which were used mainly recreational purposes. The private
car is linked with the emergence of the firsts low density suburbs with increased
ethnic and economic segregation. This went on par with the decentralization
of commercial and industrial activities. It is during this phase that European
and North American urban development started to diverge. In order to facilitate
the diffusion of the road as a mode of urban transportation in the United States,
several oil and car companies bought and dismantled tramway systems. For instance,
in 1938 General Motors and Standard oil bought the Pacific Electric Railway
of Los Angeles, dismantled it and replaced tramways with buses. Consequently,
the influence of streetcars in the urban development in North America was being
removed, while it endured in many European cities.
- IV - The highway era (1945-2000). The post World War Two era saw
the large diffusion of the automobile with a growth of individual mobility.
Highways favored the extension of full fledged suburbs, especially in North
America. This process also took place in Europe, but to a lower extent and involved
higher densities along existing transit axis. No new technologies urban transport
techniques emerged during this era but improvements of transport infrastructures
significantly increased accessibility. Residential and employment decentralization
was thus accentuated. Also, several sub-centers emerged to serve suburbs, a
process favored by the construction of ring roads around metropolitan areas.
The development of new highways which circle urban perimeters have encouraged
an agglomeration of commercial, distribution and manufacturing activities around
high accessibility clusters in suburban areas.
The 21st century is bringing several issues about the future relationships
between transportation and the urban form. In the era of telecommunications
a decline in individual mobility and a concentration of activities along transport
corridors can be expected, especially in North America. This process will be correlated
to higher prices for individual mobility as well as attempts at substituting telecommunications
to transport in several sectors of activity, notably tertiary and quaternary sectors.
Future urban forms are thus likely to be of higher densities with a concentration
around clusters. Yet the impacts of telecommunications on urban mobility and urban
form remains to be assessed.